Cookies for analytics and advertising
We use cookies for analytics and advertising, both sent to Google. Refusing changes nothing you can see.Read the privacy page
MP3
Up to 100 files at once. Mixed formats are fine.
They convert one after another and download together as a ZIP.
Removing metadata from an audio file strips the ID3 tags, the embedded cover art and any comments while leaving the audio itself untouched — the samples are copied across without being decoded. The file usually gets noticeably smaller, because cover art is often the largest thing in a tagged music file.
Remove audio metadata
A tagged MP3 carries the title, artist, album, year, genre and comments — and very often a cover image at full resolution, which can be several hundred kilobytes in a file of three megabytes. Removing the tags removes the picture with them, and the size difference is immediately visible.
Recordings that are not music carry different things. A voice memo may carry the device name; an interview exported from editing software may carry the project name, the operator and a description field that a field recorder filled in automatically.
MP3, FLAC and WAV all keep their metadata in blocks at a known place — in front of the audio, behind it, or in labelled chunks. Removing them is a copy that skips those blocks, so no decoder runs and the audio is bit-for-bit identical.
The one part that needs care is FLAC, where the metadata blocks are a chain and the last one is flagged as last. Removing the final block without moving that flag produces a file that a decoder reads as noise — so the flag moves to whatever block is now last, and a test checks it.
Beyond title and artist, an audio file commonly carries the encoder that made it, the software that tagged it, a purchase identifier from a store, an acoustic fingerprint, comments left by whatever ripped it, and occasionally a user name. None of it is audible and all of it travels.
For music bought from a store, the purchase identifier is the field worth knowing about — it ties the file to an account, which is the point of it. For a recording you made, the encoder and software fields say which machine and which application, which is more than most people intend to publish alongside an audio clip.
Some commercial audio carries a watermark encoded into the sound itself, at a level designed to be inaudible and to survive re-encoding. That is part of the waveform rather than part of the metadata, and stripping tags does not touch it.
It is worth being clear about, because the two get conflated. This removes what the file says about itself in its tag blocks. It cannot remove something that was mixed into the audio, and no tool that leaves the recording listenable can.
A single embedded cover image at full resolution is frequently several hundred kilobytes, and some files carry more than one — front cover, back cover, a booklet scan. On a four-minute track at 192 kbps that can be a fifth of the file.
So stripping metadata from a music library often produces a size reduction that looks like compression and is not: the audio is untouched and identical. If the artwork is wanted, it is worth extracting before stripping rather than discovering afterwards that it is gone.
The file name, and little else. A music application sorts by whatever it can read, so a stripped library arrives as a list of file names in whatever order the folder gives, with no album grouping and no artwork.
That is fine for a recording being sent to someone or submitted somewhere, and it is usually not what anyone wants for a library they listen to. Stripping is the right step before a file leaves and the wrong one for files staying put.
No. For MP3, FLAC and WAV the audio bytes are copied without ever being decoded, so what you get back is bit-for-bit what you put in. M4A is rewritten by the browser's media handling, which likewise copies the encoded samples rather than re-encoding them.
Yes — it is stored inside the tag, so it goes with the tag. That is usually where most of the saved space comes from.
It will show the file name and nothing else, because the title and artist were exactly what you removed. If you want a clean file that still identifies itself, remove the metadata and then add back only the fields you want in a tag editor.
No. The file is rewritten inside your browser and never leaves your device — which is the only arrangement that makes sense for a tool whose job is to remove information you would rather not share.
The page lists what it found before the removal and inspects the result afterwards, so you watch the list go empty. You can also check independently: the properties dialog of whatever application opens the file will show the same thing.
Sometimes the better answer is a different format — especially for a photograph stored as MP3.