Convert DNG to TIFF

Converting DNG to TIFF extracts the rendered preview stored inside the DNG and writes it out uncompressed, which is what a report or print workflow needs when Lightroom is not available. Unlike every other raw format here, that preview was written by software rather than by a camera — so its size varies, it may reflect edits, and occasionally there is none at all.

  • Where it runs In your browser. The file is never uploaded.
  • Lossy Some detail is traded for size. TIFF cannot hold everything a DNG can.
  • File size limit Up to 100 MB per file, free, without an account.
  • Worth knowing This extracts the preview your camera wrote when it took the photograph, at full resolution on almost every camera. It is the camera’s own rendering, so its picture style is baked in and the extra highlight and shadow latitude that is the reason to shoot raw is not in it. Perfect for viewing, sending or uploading; not a substitute for developing the file.

Up to 100 files at once. Mixed formats are fine.

The preview inside a DNG was written by software, not by a camera

This is the difference that runs through the whole page. In a CR2, an NEF, an ARW, an ORF or an RAF, the embedded picture was produced by the camera’s processor at the instant of capture and its size and quality are fixed properties of that body. A DNG might have come from a Leica, a Pentax, a Ricoh, a phone or a drone that writes DNG natively — or it might have been produced by Adobe’s DNG Converter from some other raw file entirely, years after the photograph was taken.

In the Adobe case the preview is whatever the conversion was told to write. The choices offered are Embedded and Sidecar, Medium Size, Full Size and None, and they are per-conversion settings that most people accept the default of and never think about again. A folder of DNGs from the same archive can therefore produce full-resolution TIFFs, half-resolution ones, or a run of failures, depending on decisions made by whoever ran the converter.

What happens when a DNG has no usable preview

The converter looks for every JPEG inside the file and keeps the largest above 640 by 480, refusing anything smaller because handing over a thumbnail is a worse outcome than a clear failure. If a DNG was written with the preview set to None, or with only a small embedded thumbnail, that refusal is what you will see.

It is not a damaged file and the sensor data is intact. The remedies are to re-save the DNG from Adobe’s converter or Lightroom with a full-size preview, which takes seconds per file and is worth doing across an archive once, or to develop the file properly in software that reads the raw data. What will not help is trying again, because there is nothing above the threshold to find.

A DNG preview may already contain somebody’s edits

When Lightroom writes changes back into a DNG, it updates the embedded preview to match. The result is that the picture extracted here can be the adjusted rendering — the exposure lifted, the white balance corrected, the crop applied — rather than the neutral capture.

This is useful when you want it and misleading when you do not. If the DNG came out of somebody’s catalogue, the TIFF you produce may reflect their edits and their crop. If you are working from an archive and need the unedited frame, this route cannot give it to you, because what is stored is the last rendering somebody saved. Convert one file and look at it before assuming which of the two you have.

The size of an uncompressed TIFF from a DNG

Four bytes per pixel, no compression, plus about a kilobyte of header. A 20-megapixel drone frame at 5,472 by 3,648 gives 79.8 MB. A 36-megapixel Pentax K-1 file at 7,360 by 4,912 gives 144.6 MB. A 47-megapixel Leica Q2 at 8,368 by 5,584 gives 186.9 MB. A 48-megapixel phone capture at 8,064 by 6,048 gives 195 MB.

If the preview was written at Medium Size rather than Full Size, the numbers fall accordingly and so does the resolution — which is another reason to check the dimensions of the first file rather than the size of the last. A report that needs a picture at 200 mm across the page does not need 8,000 pixels; a print does.

Sixteen bits in the DNG, eight in the TIFF

The DNG specification permits 8 to 32 bits per sample; the registry records 16 for it, which is the deepest figure it holds for a raw container — more than the 14 that Canon, Nikon, Sony and Fujifilm write and considerably more than Olympus’s 12. TIFF can hold 16 as well, and this conversion writes eight, because the embedded preview is an eight-bit JPEG and there is nothing deeper to take.

So the one format most likely to be chosen for its archival depth produces, through this route, the shallowest kind of derivative. That is not an argument against the conversion — an eight-bit TIFF is exactly right for placing a picture in a report — but it is an argument against treating the output as anything other than a derivative. The depth is in the DNG and stays there.

An open raw format written into an open raster one

DNG is unusual among raw formats in being genuinely open: Adobe published the specification, it was standardised as ISO 12234-2, and it is the reason DNG is recommended by archivists who will not accept a proprietary camera format. TIFF has the same property from a different direction, having been documented and stable since the 1980s.

It is worth being clear that this conversion does not inherit the virtue of either. What it produces is a plain uncompressed baseline TIFF: no compression, one strip, RGB, eight bits per sample, four samples per pixel with the fourth declared as alpha, and no ICC profile. That file will still be readable in fifty years, which is the property people want from TIFF. It contains a rendering rather than the data the rendering came from.

Drone and phone DNG files, where this route earns its place

The DNG files most people now hold did not come from a dedicated camera. Drones write them for survey and inspection work, phones write them from computational pipelines, and both produce large numbers of files that end up in reports, claims and planning documents rather than in galleries.

For those the extracted preview is often better than a naive development would be, because the device’s own pipeline did work — noise reduction, lens correction, tone mapping, sometimes multi-frame merging — that a general-purpose raw converter starting from the mosaic data does not reproduce. Converting the preview gives you the picture the device intended. Developing the DNG in unfamiliar software can give you something flatter and noisier, and it is worth comparing the two on one file before choosing a route for a hundred.

What the DNG carries that the TIFF will not

The metadata does not survive the decode and re-encode: no camera or phone model, no lens, no exposure settings, no capture time, no GPS coordinate. On drone and phone DNGs that last one is present far more often than on files from a dedicated camera, and the absence is usually welcome.

For survey and inspection work it is also a problem, because the coordinate is frequently the point of the photograph. Read the location out of the DNG and put it in the report, the file name or a sidecar rather than relying on the image file to carry it, and keep the DNGs as the authoritative record of where and when each frame was taken.

When the answer is a proper export rather than a DNG extraction

If Lightroom or Camera Raw is available and the DNG is in a catalogue, exporting a 16-bit TIFF with a chosen colour profile is better in every measurable way and takes about the same amount of clicking. That is the honest recommendation and this page is not going to argue with it.

What this route is for is the rest of the time: an archive of DNGs whose catalogue is lost, a licence that has expired, a machine you are not allowed to install on, a colleague’s files that arrived without any software, or a hundred drone frames that need to be in a document by the end of the day. In those cases the extracted preview is the picture that exists, and getting it into a TIFF takes seconds.

Converting a DNG archive without uploading it

Everything runs in the browser: the DNG is read from disk by the page, scanned for its embedded preview, decoded and written out as a TIFF. No request carries the image, which the network tab will confirm and a disconnected machine will prove.

Input files are accepted up to 100 MB on the free tier. Most DNGs sit well below that; a 100-megapixel medium-format DNG or a lossless-uncompressed conversion of one can exceed it, and in that case a re-save with Adobe’s lossy DNG option or a direct export from the raw software is the way round. Whole folders can be dropped at once and taken as a ZIP.

How to get a TIFF out of a DNG file without Lightroom

  1. Convert one file first and check both that it succeeds and what dimensions it produces.
  2. Drop the rest of the DNG files onto this page. Nothing is uploaded.
  3. Download the TIFF files, and re-save any DNG that failed with a full-size preview.

DNG vs TIFF: an open raw container and the raster it renders to

DNG compared with TIFF
DNGTIFF
Full nameDigital NegativeTagged Image File Format
File extension.dng.tif, .tiff
Media typeimage/x-adobe-dngimage/tiff
CompressionLossless — nothing is discardedLossless — nothing is discarded
First published20041986
Published byAdobeAdobe
SpecificationISO 12234-4TIFF 6.0
LicensingOpen standardPublished, not standardised
Standing todayCurrentCurrent
Bit depth1632
Colour it can describeRGBRGB, CMYK, greyscale, Lab
Opens in a browserNo browserSome browsers
Considered insteadJPGPNG, PDF

What the target format adds

TIFF supports transparency and DNG does not. That is room the result has and the original never used — converting does not create a transparent background, it only makes one possible afterwards.

Opening the result

Only some browsers open TIFF. DNG has narrower browser support than that. If the file is going onto a web page or into a form, that is usually the whole reason for the conversion.

The usual programs do not overlap: DNG opens in Adobe Lightroom, Adobe Camera Raw and darktable, TIFF in Adobe Photoshop, Affinity Photo and ImageMagick — so whoever receives the result needs something from the second list.

What each format is for

DNG is Adobe's format, published in 2004. It comes out of Leica, Pentax, Ricoh and phone cameras, plus anything converted. Underneath it is TIFF, which is why a program that has never heard of DNG can sometimes still open one.

TIFF comes from Adobe and dates from 1986, specified as TIFF 6.0. Adobe Photoshop, Affinity Photo and ImageMagick all read it.

TIFF was published in 1986 and DNG in 2004. The older one is generally the safer file to hand to somebody; the newer one usually does the job in fewer bytes.

DNG to TIFF: previews, missing images and file sizes

Are my DNG files uploaded anywhere?

No. This conversion runs entirely inside your browser, so the file never leaves your device. You can confirm it yourself: open the network tab of your browser's developer tools and convert something. You will see the page load, plus the analytics and advertising the site is paid for with — and nothing carrying your file. The engine behind this particular pair is a raw preview extractor, which pulls the JPEG the camera already embedded rather than developing the sensor data; your browser fetches it once and caches it.

Why does one of my DNG files fail with "no preview"?

Because a DNG’s preview is written by whatever software produced the file, and that software may have written a small one or none at all. Adobe’s DNG Converter and Lightroom offer Embedded and Sidecar, Medium Size, Full Size and None. Anything below 640 by 480 is treated here as a thumbnail and refused, on the grounds that a postage stamp is a worse outcome than a clear failure. Re-save the DNG with a full-size preview, or develop it properly.

Does the preview show my Lightroom edits?

If the DNG was saved from Lightroom after editing, yes — the preview is a rendering of the file as adjusted, so exposure, white balance and tone changes are visible in it. That is unique to DNG among the raw formats here, where every other preview was made by a camera at the moment of capture and reflects no editing at all. It is also a reason to check what you actually got before assuming it is the unedited original.

How large is the TIFF?

Four bytes a pixel with no compression. A 20-megapixel drone frame at 5,472 by 3,648 gives about 80 MB; a 36-megapixel Pentax K-1 at 7,360 by 4,912 gives about 145 MB; a 47-megapixel Leica Q2 at 8,368 by 5,584 gives about 187 MB; a 48-megapixel phone capture at 8,064 by 6,048 gives about 195 MB.

Should I export the TIFF from Lightroom instead?

If you have Lightroom and the DNG in a catalogue, yes without much argument. It develops the sensor data, can write 16 bits per channel, and can attach the colour profile the destination asked for. This page exists for the case where the software is not available, the licence has lapsed, the machine is not yours, or the DNG is an orphan from an archive nobody has a catalogue for.

Is DNG not a kind of TIFF already?

Structurally yes — DNG is built on TIFF/EP, which is why the two files share a heritage and why some tools can inspect a DNG without displaying it. It changes nothing about this conversion. The picture-bearing part of a DNG is mosaiced sensor data that no ordinary TIFF reader can interpret, and what comes out of this page is the embedded rendered preview written as plain RGB.

Does anything leave the machine?

No. The DNG is read and scanned locally and the TIFF is written locally, which matters for survey, insurance and site material that is not yours to circulate.

More about these formats

Where these figures come from

The claims this page makes about DNG and TIFF are checkable, and these are the documents that settle them.

  • TIFF, Revision 6.0

    Library of Congress, Sustainability of Digital Formats — TIFF’s tag structure and its many compression options