Convert RAR to ZIP

Converting RAR to ZIP takes an archive most computers refuse to open and hands back one every computer opens. RAR has been proprietary since Eugene Roshal wrote it in 1993, so reading it needs software you may not be allowed to install; ZIP has been built into Windows and macOS for years. The files are unchanged, and the ZIP is usually a little larger — the trade for needing no tool at all.

  • Where it runs On our server, because a browser cannot run the software this needs.
  • Lossless Nothing is discarded. The ZIP holds exactly what the RAR held.
  • File size limit Up to 25 MB per file, free, without an account.
  • Worth knowing The files come out byte for byte. What does not survive is anything the container held about them rather than in them — a password, and on some formats the original permissions and timestamps.

Up to 100 files at once. Mixed formats are fine.

Being sent a RAR you have no way to open

This is the most common archive problem there is. RAR is popular with people who compress a lot and invisible to everyone else, because no operating system ships anything that reads it. Windows shows a blank icon, macOS offers to search the App Store, and a managed work laptop will not let you install WinRAR to find out what a colleague sent you.

ZIP is the opposite in every respect: published as APPNOTE.TXT since 1989, supported natively on both major desktops, and accepted by essentially every upload form, shared drive and ticketing system in existence. Converting is not an upgrade — RAR is technically the stronger archive and compresses better — it is a translation into the format your machine already speaks. The conversion is worth doing precisely because the constraint is not the file, it is the environment you have to open it in, and that is the part you cannot change.

How this site is able to read a RAR at all

The tool that unpacks it is `unrar-free`, which is GPL-2+ and part of Debian's main archive, invoked as a separate process on our converter. That was not the expected answer. The obvious route is RARLAB's own `unrar` from Debian's non-free component, and it would have been the first non-free piece in a stack that is otherwise BSD, MIT and Apache.

It was also not needed. The received wisdom that the free implementation is stuck at RAR4 turned out to be out of date, so the non-free dependency would have been taken on for nothing at all. The 7-Zip build used for every other archive format here does not help either: Debian compiles it without the RAR codec, which is why RAR travels a different path through the converter than anything else on this site. None of that changes what you get back, but it is the reason this pair exists at all — and the reason the site can offer it without a proprietary component sitting in the middle of an otherwise permissively licensed stack.

RAR5 is measured, RAR4 is the honest gap

RAR5 is the format everything has written since 2013, and support for it here was verified against a real archive with nested directories and compressed content rather than taken on trust. If your file came from any recent version of WinRAR, that is the case this conversion was tested for.

RAR4 is untested and this page would rather say so than imply a coverage we have not checked. The trial packer available for building test fixtures only writes RAR5, so there was no way to produce a RAR4 file to try. The tool's original purpose was exactly that format, so it very probably works — but "very probably" is the truthful word, and a failure surfaces as the ordinary conversion error rather than as anything dramatic.

Why nothing here will ever write a RAR

Conversions on this site run in both directions wherever they can, and this one does not. The UnRAR licence allows the code to be used for extracting archives and specifically forbids using it to build a program that creates them, so producing a RAR is the one thing our converter may not do.

It is enforced rather than remembered. The format is marked as unwritable in our registry, the converter's own list of formats it may write does not contain it, and a test fails if those two ever disagree. That is why you will find `rar` as a source on this site and never as a target, and why the answer to "convert my ZIP to RAR" is a flat no rather than a maybe.

Expect the ZIP to be larger than the RAR was

RAR is a solid format: it compresses the members as one continuous stream, so material repeated across files is stored once. ZIP compresses every entry independently against a 32 KB window and writes a directory at the end listing them all.

The result is that the same content usually needs more room as a ZIP, and the gap widens with the number of similar files. A RAR holding two hundred documents from one template will grow noticeably; a RAR holding a single film will barely move, because video was compressed long before it was archived. If the size matters more than the compatibility, converting to 7Z keeps solid compression in an open format.

Password-protected RAR archives are refused

RAR supports encryption and an encrypted archive cannot be unpacked without its password, so the job stops with a message. The extractor is deliberately run in a way that fails rather than waits — there is no terminal on the converter for a password prompt to appear in, and a job that hangs until it is killed is a worse experience than one that says no immediately.

If you have the password, extract the archive on a machine where you can, then compress the folder to ZIP from the file manager. If you do not have it, nothing on this page or anywhere else will help, and any site that claims otherwise is selling something.

Split RAR volumes and the single-file limit

RAR made multi-volume archives normal — `part1.rar`, `part2.rar` and so on, or the older `.r00` sequence — because it was designed when files moved on floppies and modems. Extracting one needs every volume available at once.

This converter receives a single uploaded file, so a set cannot be reassembled here even if you upload the first part: the extractor finds the archive incomplete and the job fails. The way through is to put the volumes back together with a local archiver, or to ask whoever sent it for one whole file. It is a real limitation of the arrangement rather than a bug, and it is better stated up front than discovered after four uploads.

RAR features that have no ZIP equivalent

RAR carries some things ZIP has never had. A recovery record — optional redundancy stored inside the archive that can repair a damaged file — has no counterpart in the ZIP specification, so it does not survive the conversion. Neither does RAR's own encryption, since an encrypted archive cannot be converted in the first place.

The general rule for archive conversions here is the useful one to remember: the members come out byte for byte, and what is at risk is whatever the container knew about them rather than what was inside them. Passwords and, on some formats, permissions and timestamps are the usual casualties. Your actual files are not.

Where your RAR goes during the conversion

Most tools on this site never send your file anywhere, and this is one of the exceptions, because unpacking a RAR needs a real program rather than something that can run inside a browser tab. The file is uploaded over an encrypted connection, extracted, repacked as a ZIP and returned. Everything the job touched — the upload, the extracted files and the output — is deleted when it finishes, and nobody reads any of it.

The working space is memory-backed and bounded, the container that ran the job is thrown away afterwards, and any job still running at sixty seconds is killed. The free tier accepts 25 MB per file, and an archive that declares it expands to more than 2 GB is refused before a single byte is written to disk — the standard defence against a file built to fill a disk rather than to hold data. If the archive is genuinely confidential, 7-Zip and Keka both read RAR on your own machine and never send it anywhere.

Opening the ZIP once you have it

On Windows, double-clicking the ZIP shows the contents as though it were a folder, and that view is genuinely a preview rather than an extraction — files dragged out of it are copied, files edited inside it often are not saved back where you expect. The reliable move is Extract All to a real folder before you work on anything, which is the same advice that has been true of Windows ZIP handling for twenty years.

On macOS, double-clicking extracts the whole archive next to it immediately, with no preview step at all. Either way, the point of the conversion has been reached at that moment: the contents are ordinary files in an ordinary folder, and the RAR that started the problem can be deleted or filed away. Nothing further needs installing, which for most people arriving at this page is the entire objective.

How to convert RAR to ZIP

  1. Drop your RAR onto this page, or click to choose one.
  2. It is extracted with unrar-free and repacked as a ZIP.
  3. Download the ZIP and open it with the tools you already have.

RAR beside ZIP: a proprietary archive and an open one

RAR compared with ZIP
RARZIP
Full nameRAR ArchiveZIP Archive
File extension.rar.zip
Media typeapplication/vnd.rarapplication/zip
CompressionLossless — nothing is discardedLossless — nothing is discarded
First published19931989
Published bywin.rar GmbHPKWARE
SpecificationAPPNOTE.TXT
LicensingProprietaryOpen standard
Standing todayCurrentCurrent
Opens in a browserNo browserNo browser
Considered instead7Z7Z, TAR

What survives

Nothing is discarded. RAR and ZIP both store their content losslessly, so the conversion is a change of packaging rather than a change of quality, and it can be repeated without accumulating damage.

What the target format adds

ZIP is a working format and RAR is a finished one. What comes back is editable text and objects rather than a picture of a page, which is usually the reason for the conversion and also where its limits are.

Opening the result

RAR is a vendor format; ZIP is a published specification (APPNOTE.TXT). That matters for anything meant to still open in ten years, when the program that wrote the original may not be around.

7-Zip reads both RAR and ZIP, so there is a way to check the result against the original without a second tool.

What each format is for

The two are aimed at different work: RAR at archiving, ZIP at moving data between programs and handing a finished file over. That is worth weighing before converting, because the reason one exists is usually the reason the other is awkward.

ZIP comes from PKWARE and dates from 1989, specified as APPNOTE.TXT. Windows Explorer, Finder and 7-Zip all read it.

RAR to ZIP: what works, what does not, and why

Are my RAR files uploaded anywhere?

Yes — this conversion needs software that cannot run in a browser, so the file is uploaded over an encrypted connection. It is deleted as soon as the job finishes, and the result is sent straight back to you without being stored. The work is done by 7-Zip, the archiver, in its command-line form.

Do I need WinRAR or 7-Zip for this?

No, and that is usually why people are here. The archive is unpacked on our server and comes back as a ZIP, which Windows Explorer and the macOS Finder have opened for years without anything installed.

Does it handle modern RAR5 archives?

Yes. RAR5 has been what everything writes since 2013 and it was tested here against a real archive, including nested directories and compressed content, rather than assumed to work.

What about a very old RAR file?

RAR4 is the honest gap. The tool we use was originally written for it and it very probably works, but we have not been able to produce a RAR4 archive to test with. If one fails, you get the ordinary "could not be converted" message rather than anything alarming.

Can you convert something back into a RAR?

No, and it is a licence condition rather than a missing feature. The UnRAR licence permits extracting and forbids using the code to build a RAR-compatible packer, so no tool on this site will ever produce one.

My RAR is split into part1, part2 and so on. Will that work?

Not through this page. The converter receives one file, and a multi-volume set needs every volume present at the same time. Rejoin them with an archiver locally, or ask the sender for a single archive.

Will the ZIP be bigger than the RAR?

Usually yes. RAR is a solid format that compresses its members as one stream; ZIP compresses each entry separately through a 32 KB window, so the same content takes more room. That is the cost of a format everything opens.

More about these formats

Where these figures come from

The claims this page makes about RAR and ZIP are checkable, and these are the documents that settle them.