Convert ORF to JPG

Converting ORF to JPG extracts the finished JPEG your Olympus or OM System body wrote inside the raw file at capture, which for this system is often the picture the camera computed rather than merely recorded. The EXIF is stripped out by default and kept if you want it, it needs nothing installed, and it works on a tablet in a hotel room.

  • Where it runs In your browser. The file is never uploaded.
  • Lossy Some detail is traded for size. JPG cannot hold everything an ORF can.
  • File size limit Up to 100 MB per file, free, without an account.
  • Worth knowing This extracts the preview your camera wrote when it took the photograph, at full resolution on almost every camera. It is the camera’s own rendering, so its picture style is baked in and the extra highlight and shadow latitude that is the reason to shoot raw is not in it. Perfect for viewing, sending or uploading; not a substitute for developing the file.

Up to 100 files at once. Mixed formats are fine.

Why the camera’s own picture matters more on an Olympus

Most raw formats hold a straightforward capture and a preview of it. Olympus and OM System bodies frequently hold something the camera assembled: High Res Shot combines several sensor-shifted exposures into a much higher-resolution image, Live Composite builds a long exposure that only accumulates new light, in-camera focus stacking merges a bracket into one sharp frame, and Live ND simulates a neutral density filter.

In every one of those the interesting picture is the computation, and the computation happened inside the camera. The embedded preview is the finished result. Third-party raw developers frequently cannot reproduce these modes at all, which turns the usual argument on its head — extraction is not the lesser path here, it is often the only one that gives you what you shot.

What an ORF holds and what this pulls out of it

ORF is a TIFF-derived container Olympus has written since 2002, carrying Micro Four Thirds sensor readings — 12 bits per channel, according to the format record behind this site, rather than the 14 that the larger-sensor formats use. Alongside them the camera writes a complete JPEG at the moment of capture.

The converter scans the file for embedded JPEGs, keeps the largest above 640 by 480 and returns it. No demosaicing happens, so the process is fast enough to run through a card of files on a phone, and the picture you receive is the camera’s rendering with its Picture Mode applied.

Twelve bits, and what it means for the raw-versus-preview trade

Latitude scales with bit depth and with sensor size, and Micro Four Thirds is smaller than APS-C or full frame. A 12-bit ORF has real headroom, and less of it than a 14-bit file off a full-frame body — which means the gap between "the camera’s rendering" and "what a careful development could recover" is narrower on this system than on most.

That is not an argument for throwing away the ORF; a blown highlight is still recoverable from raw and still not recoverable from an 8-bit preview. It is an argument for not feeling that extraction is a compromise on ordinary frames. For a correctly exposed picture, the camera’s JPEG is very close to what you would have arrived at anyway.

Filing from a trip without the desktop that has OM Workspace

The system’s whole appeal is weight, and the people who chose it are disproportionately away from their main machine: on a mountain, in a hide, three weeks into a trip with a tablet and a card reader. That is the awkward moment, because ORF is invisible to browsers, needs a codec on Windows, and OM Workspace is not going onto an iPad.

This runs in the browser tab with nothing installed, so the tablet and the card reader are a complete filing setup. It also works with the connection off, since nothing is being sent anywhere — useful on a hotel network that charges by the megabyte.

The EXIF that survives an ORF extraction

The preview is passed through without a re-encode, so everything the camera wrote into it could come with it: lens and focal length, aperture, shutter speed, ISO, capture time, and GPS coordinates where the body or a paired phone supplied them. Whether it does is a setting. "Remove metadata" is on by default, so the EXIF is edited out before you get the file, and what survives regardless is the ICC colour profile.

For a wildlife or landscape photographer that default is the useful one — nest sites and specific spots get shared far too readily by accident, and a JPG posted from a trip is exactly how it happens. When you do want the data, for your own records or for a submission that asks for capture details, turn the option off and the block arrives intact. Setting a maximum width is no longer the way to strip metadata: it only ever did so by forcing a re-encode, and that spends quality for nothing.

What the extracted JPG cannot do that the ORF still can

The Picture Mode is baked in. A frame shot in Monochrome comes out monochrome and the colour is not retrievable from the JPG, though it is still sitting in the ORF. Auto white balance that misjudged a scene under snow or forest canopy is likewise fixed in place.

Highlight recovery is the clearest limit. A bright sky rendered as flat white in the preview usually still holds detail in the sensor data, because the preview was made with a tone curve that clipped it. If a frame is worth the effort, keep the ORF and open it in OM Workspace, Lightroom or darktable — all three read it.

An ORF that will not give up a preview

Anything below 640 by 480 is rejected rather than returned, because a thumbnail dressed up as a conversion is worse than a clear failure. That threshold is almost never a problem on files straight from a camera.

It becomes one on files that took a detour: recovered by an undelete tool, truncated by a card removed mid-write, or written by third-party software that did not include a preview. The original card copy is the first thing to try; failing that, the file needs a decoder that reads the sensor data.

Converting a card of Olympus files in one go

Drop the whole selection and take the result as a ZIP. Each file is scanned separately with its own progress, and because a JPG target at the default settings involves no re-encoding at all, the limit is how fast your device can read the files.

The free tier accepts up to 100 MB per file, which no ordinary ORF approaches — a 20-megapixel frame is around 20 MB — and which even a High Res Shot file stays inside.

Pictures that stay on the device they were copied to

The conversion is local: the ORF files are read from your card or disk, scanned in memory, and the JPGs written back. Nothing is transmitted at any point, which matters on a shared hotel connection as much as it does for privacy.

You can verify it instead of trusting it. Open the developer tools and watch the network tab during a conversion, or put the device into aeroplane mode and convert anyway.

How to convert Olympus ORF files without OM Workspace

  1. Drop your ORF files onto this page, or click to choose them.
  2. The embedded JPEG — including a High Res Shot or Live Composite result — is copied out.
  3. Download the JPGs, or take the whole card as a single ZIP.

ORF vs JPG: Micro Four Thirds raw against a shareable picture

ORF compared with JPG
ORFJPG
Full nameOlympus Raw FormatJPEG Image
File extension.orf.jpg, .jpeg, .jpe
Media typeimage/x-olympus-orfimage/jpeg
CompressionLossless — nothing is discardedLossy — file size is bought with quality
First published20021992
Published byOlympusJoint Photographic Experts Group
SpecificationITU-T T.81
LicensingProprietaryOpen standard
Standing todayCurrentCurrent
Bit depth128
Colour it can describeRGBRGB, greyscale, YCbCr
Largest image65,535 px per side
Opens in a browserNo browserEvery browser
Considered insteadDNG, TIFFWebP, AVIF, HEIC

What is lost

ORF carries up to 12 bits per channel and JPG stores 8. The extra precision is what survives heavy correction without banding, so the conversion is best made after the editing rather than before it.

What survives

EXIF, XMP and GPS coordinates can cross over — both ORF and JPG have somewhere to store them.

Opening the result

JPG opens in every current browser. ORF has narrower browser support than that. If the file is going onto a web page or into a form, that is usually the whole reason for the conversion.

ORF is a vendor format; JPG is a published specification (ITU-T T.81). That matters for anything meant to still open in ten years, when the program that wrote the original may not be around.

The usual programs do not overlap: ORF opens in Adobe Lightroom, OM Workspace and darktable, JPG in Adobe Photoshop, GIMP and Preview — so whoever receives the result needs something from the second list.

File size and quality

The file gets substantially smaller, and it gets smaller by discarding detail. ORF keeps everything; JPG keeps what the eye is poor at noticing. On a photograph that trade is close to free; on text, a screenshot or a line drawing it is visible as haloing around the edges.

What each format is for

ORF is Olympus's format, published in 2002. It comes out of Olympus and OM System bodies. Underneath it is TIFF, which is why a program that has never heard of ORF can sometimes still open one.

JPG comes from Joint Photographic Experts Group and dates from 1992, specified as ITU-T T.81. Adobe Photoshop, GIMP and Preview all read it.

ORF to JPG: what Olympus and OM System owners ask

Are my ORF files uploaded anywhere?

No. This conversion runs entirely inside your browser, so the file never leaves your device. You can confirm it yourself: open the network tab of your browser's developer tools and convert something. You will see the page load, plus the analytics and advertising the site is paid for with — and nothing carrying your file. The engine behind this particular pair is a raw preview extractor, which pulls the JPEG the camera already embedded rather than developing the sensor data; your browser fetches it once and caches it.

Does this work with High Res Shot files?

Yes. High Res Shot produces a larger ORF assembled from several sensor-shifted exposures, and the camera writes a preview of the finished composite into it like any other file. That preview is what comes out, which is the assembled high-resolution picture rather than one of the component frames.

What about Live Composite and in-camera focus stacking?

Same answer, and it is the strongest argument for extraction on this system. Those are computational results the camera produced. The preview is the composite the camera made; reproducing it from the raw data in third-party software is often not possible at all.

Is this developing the ORF?

No. It extracts the JPEG the camera embedded at capture, with the Picture Mode you had set — Natural, Vivid, Muted, Monochrome — already applied. The sensor data stays in the ORF untouched and its latitude is not in the result.

Does the JPG keep the EXIF?

Not unless you ask. "Remove metadata" is on by default, so lens, focal length, exposure settings, timestamp and any GPS coordinate are taken out of the JPG. Turn the option off and they are all kept, because the preview is handed over without being re-encoded. The colour profile stays either way.

Can I do this on a tablet or phone?

Yes, and for this system that is often the point. It runs in the browser with nothing to install, so a card reader on a tablet is enough to file pictures from a trip.

How large are ORF files?

Modest. A 20-megapixel Micro Four Thirds frame runs in the region of 20 MB, well inside the 100 MB free limit. High Res Shot files are considerably larger and still comfortably under it.

More about these formats

Where these figures come from

The claims this page makes about ORF and JPG are checkable, and these are the documents that settle them.